Thursday, November 13, 2008

Being a Catholic in 2008

UPDATE: I hadn't read this when I wrote the post below:

What one believes about God and creation and life after death, I have learned, is personal and complicated. Those of us who have spent a life doubting and insisting that our brains be permitted to function as they were meant to have often viewed church-going people with some sort of awe -- how can they be so sure?

It turns out that many, many, many aren't so sure and that the doubters' views of faith and religion are just, sometimes, wrongheaded. Faith is something that some folks seem genetically hardwired to have--it's a gift. Religion, while not unrelated to faith, is nonetheless different. It's something you practice. You can practice it, and benefit from it, even if you are not a faith-filled person. Just ask Mother Theresa.

Once I figured all this out, I found a great deal of comfort and intellectual satisfaction in being a Catholic. Catholicism, I have always believed, points a way to a right life (not the way, mind you). By following a perfect life through the liturgical year, we learn to be good children, good parents, good stewards of our world. From the liturgical Christ, we learn to suffer with grace, to stand up for the oppressed, and to accept our ultimate fate as mortals. We learn to submit when necessary. We learn to see the "divine" in one another.

The Catholic Church does not, like so many other denominations, reject physical existence. It revels in it. That's what the sacraments are -- the links between the physical facts of life and divinity. And, as the Church understood Christ for much of the 20th Century, an emphasis on physical existence calls us to service and tolerance. Mother Theresa said that if you want to find God, don't look in the cathedrals, look in the ghettos. That resonated with me. It still does.

In the past years, during the tenure of the last pope and, certainly, in the tenure of the present one, the Church has become more conservative. It is not that its harsher views have changed, it's that the consequences of questioning them have become harsher. Catholics are no longer invited to examine their consciences to test their alignment with Church teachings. Instead, they are reminded of the primacy of this one religion, and, in some places, they are denied the most fundamental benefit the Church offers -- the Eucharist -- if they disagree.

I do not agree with the Church's teachings on homosexuality. For years, I was content to live with tolerating the "condition" while condemning the "practice," but then priests began denying communion to gays and to gay sympathizers. My son attends a Catholic school. He is nine. Suppose, when he is 13, he decides he is gay? What will this new, conservative Church say to him?

I agree with the Church that the number of abortions in this country must be reduced and that the optimal number is zero. But, apparently like many Catholics, I do not agree that the Church's views are practical when combined with impractical and burdensome teachings on birth control. I do not agree that voting for a "pro life" candidate is the way to ensure an end to abortion. The most a president can do toward that end is get rid of Roe. The states will then be entitled to keep abortion, if they choose -- and many will. We will have accomplished very little. Sure, some women and doctors will get arrested and some children will get born who are not wanted, but these surely are not the end goals of the Church. What sense does it make to end choice if we have just created an entirely new set of inhumane and intolerable problems? Don't we really want a world in which women don't feel forced to choose abortions?

I believe the [catholic] answer to the problem of abortion is to encourage thoughtful teaching about sex and to accept more forms of birth control as an option. I also believe in personal responsibility, and I don't think, frankly, that enough families are willing to teach that, in many circumstances, it is noble to take responsibility for your actions--even if some sacrifice is required. But I firmly believe that the biggest part of the answer is to support candidates who support women and young girls and who believe in a social safety net. I believe the answer to abortion is at our family dinner tables and in our checkbooks and in the conversations we have with our friends. And yes, in the voting booth. Because if we just vote for people who want to put women in desparate straits in jail rather than to find meaningful solutions to a problem, we will be looking at high abortion rates forever.

I cannot believe that some want to deny me communion for these convictions.

I love my Church. After Christmas, however, we are moving our son to an Episcopal school. Whether our family will remain Catholic is an issue that we discuss frequently. We stick our heads in the sand a little, we
hope for better days. But we know a reckoning may be ahead, and, for us, this is a profoundly sad thing.

3 comments:

Mike Thomas said...

My inclination is to urge you to stand up and fight for your chosen faith. Don’t allow yourselves to be pushed away by bullies cloaked in church garb. Of course, this is advice coming from a Protestant, so take it as you will. And, of course, that is totally separate from decisions on where to send your children to school. But I think the Catholic Church has done much good in the world and has the potential to do much more. But it all depends on the people that make up the church. One of my heroes is Hans Kung, the Catholic theologian who has never hesitated to butt heads with his religious superiors.

Anonymous said...

Donna:

Archbishop Gomez was ordained by a bishop, who was ordained by a bishop, who was ordained by a bishop...who was ordained by St Peter, who was given the Keys to Heaven by Jesus Christ.

This is the apostolic succession, the apostolic authority that resides in the Catholic Church. This is the Magisterium, the teaching authority of the church. With the guidance of the Holy Spirit, the teachings of the Son of God have been handed down in fullness for 2,000 years. To think God would send His Son to die for our sins on the cross and then allow his church to be misled is about the least faithful thing one can do. "The gates of Hell shall not prevail against it."

So, instead of trying to decide which of Christ's teachings you don't agree with, it would be properly humble to consider whether perhaps 2,000 years of the greatest minds of humankind, guided by the Holy Spirit might have a deeper insight into the Truth.

Consider: until recently, I was a strident advocate against illegal immigration. But the firm call of the Magisterium, in particular Archbishop Gomez himself, for comprehensive immigration reform, caused me to humble myself. I began by refusing to publicly oppose illegal immigration. Then I asked myself why my feelings contradicted those of Christ's Church. Then I changed my focus on the issue from the rule of law to the (most oftentimes) innocent immigrants involved, and to the basic morality of not treating them as equal human beings to American citizens. I am more and more amenable to the rationale for comprehensive immigration reform, and it is because I forced myself, I humbled myself, to stop and open my mind and heart to the teaching of the Church. And I am very grateful, joyful to find myself in deeper accord with the teaching of Jesus Christ as revealed by his Church.

Perhaps you can try the same moral exercise regarding abortion. I had moral blinders on because of my overriding concern for the rule of law; perhaps you can take off your mother-centric blinders and see the issue of abortion from the perspective of the unborn child as well.

Donna "Hussein" said...

I appreciate these kind words. I am well aware of the process of examining one's conscience, and I am impressed at your efforts with regard to immigration. My reflected-upon conscience is at peace on this question, however. I cannot believe that choosing "pro-life" candidates over candidates who will actually address human need and, in my opinion, reduce the number of abortions and the suffering and deaths of all innocents is the right answer.

I am sorry to say that, as much as I love the Church, it has been misled before. This is why we are permitted to examine our consciences.

Thanks so much for your thoughts.